India-Pakistan: China Takes Sides from chinesemil.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | No comments yet.

Click here for original article
Pakistani officials continue to press the U.S. for missile armed UAVs, so Pakistan can go after targets it selects, and ease the American UAVs out of Pakistan. The U.S. doesn’t trust the Pakistanis, who can be bribed, and often have divided (pro-Taliban) loyalties. Pakistani politicians don’t care, or at least have learned to live with these two problems, and want control of UAVs so they won’t continue getting criticized for allowing American UAVs to deal with hunting down and killing terrorist leaders. This is considered humiliating by many, if not most, Pakistanis. But if the Pakistani government were in charge, the bad guys could bribe, or intimidate officials, to get off the target list. You can’t do that with the Americans. What the Taliban can do is try and find who is supplying the location information of targets. The Americans actually use a wide array of sources, but the only ones the Taliban can get at are suspected spies. More are killed each month, and most are apparently innocent. This sort of thing angers a lot of people, as do a lot of Taliban policies. So the Taliban are taking note of growing public anger against them, and have, for example, allowed music to be sold again. For the last year, the Taliban had waged open, or guerilla, war against merchants who sold music CDs. The Taliban increasingly must use force to control populations, and this eventually backfires because most of the population is armed. If enough angry tribesmen get together, the Taliban are driven out of another town or valley. This has been happening a lot in the last year.

In Quetta, the largest city in Pakistani Baluchistan, two policemen were wounded when they questioned a suicide bomber equipped with a defective bomb. The bomber was wounded and captured. Baluchistan has its own tribal uprising, which has little to do with the Taliban (although the Baluch tribes allow the Taliban to hide out in Baluchistan).

China and Pakistan are becoming closer allies, and this worries India. For example, China is increasingly taking Pakistan’s side in the Kashmir dispute. While Pakistan and India occupy most of Kashmir, China also grabbed 22 percent of Kashmir, and wants a settlement that will confirm their ownership. But India disputes the Chinese claim, and many other such claims along its 4,000 kilometers border with China.

India continues to mass police and troops for a major campaign against Maoist rebels. In the last year, Maoist violence have been responsible for over a thousand deaths (most of them civilians). The Maoists are a combination of political rebels and bandits. Their activities are as often just criminal (stealing and extortion) as political (trying to influence elections or intimidate politicians.) The Maoists have been at it for two decades, and have worn out the support they long had with leftist political parties. The Maoists want a communist dictatorship, with Maoists in charge, and their former leftist allies are not keen on this.

February 3, 2010: In northwest Pakistan, a suicide car bomber rammed the specific vehicle in a convoy of five, that contained three U.S. Army Special Forces troops, killing the Americans. For years, there have been about a hundred of these American troops in Pakistan, used to train NCOs of the Frontier Corps, who then improve the training of these paramilitary troops, recruited from the tribes, who are the primary security force along the border. The accuracy of this attack (the killers knew where the Special Forces troops were headed and which car in a convoy) indicates corruption in the Pakistani security or intelligence forces. The corruption has always been there, and it would have cost a lot of cash to buy this kind of information. It may indicate the Taliban are desperate to strike back at any cost. The three dead Americans are the first to die in Pakistan in a decade of operating there. The three were travelling to a girls school that had recently been rebuilt (after having been damaged by the Taliban) with American aid.

February 2, 2010: In Pakistan (North Waziristan) American USVs fired over a dozen missiles at four villages, killing about 17 suspected Taliban and al Qaeda members.

February 1, 2010: In the Bajaur area of the Pakistani tribal territories, about 4,000 people fled their homes as troops sought, and attacked, nearby bunkers and other hiding places used by the Taliban. At least 22 of the Islamic terrorists were killed. This operation is one of several in which the army is chasing down groups of Taliban who were part of larger forces that were defeated when the army broke Taliban control in the tribal territories.

January 31, 2010: The U.S. announced that the leader of the Pakistani Taliban, Hakimullah Mehsud, was dead, having died of wounds received in an American UAV missile attack two weeks ago. This conclusion is based on reports coming out of the tribal territories of Hakimullah Mehsud’s burial, after two weeks of futile attempts to tend his wounds. Hakimullah Mehsud, replaced, after some internal fighting, the Pakistani Taliban leader who was killed by a missile strike last Summer.

January 30, 2010: In the Pakistani tribal territories, a Taliban suicide bomber killed 17 people and wounded nearly 50. The Taliban have also used several roadside bombs recently, attacking civilians in most cases. In response, the military has increased its air strikes and ground operations against the scattered Taliban groups still operating in the tribal territories.

http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/india/articles/20100205.aspx

By polaris

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Newly released WS-10A “Taihang” photos. from china-defense.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | No comments yet.

Click here for original article
Perhaps Shenyang Liming is trying to win back public confident by releasing Taihang production photos after the SAC outed the “Engine-Less-J-11b” last month. (here)Counter-public relations strike, PRC SOE style.Chief designer Zhong Enhe
By Coatepeque

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Two China related items from the Singapore Air Show. from china-defense.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | No comments yet.

Click here for original article
For long time readers of this blog; the fact that most of China’s helicopters are powered by European / Canada engines should come as no surprise. China To Fit Attack Helo With European EngineBy wendell minnick and pierre tranPublished: 7 February 2010http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4489192&c=FEA&s=CVSSINGAPORE and PARIS – China is outfitting a new attack helicopter with a European engine
By Coatepeque

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Welcome to the “Sucker Club” from china-defense.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | No comments yet.

Click here for original article
OK, we’ll admit it. We got burned on the new “20-ton” helicopter picture, it’s a fake.For a group of guys who cut their “Photoshop-discernment” teeth on thousands of faked J-10 photos in the last decade, we dropped the ball on this one. Sorry for wasting your time…at least we got to the bottom before one of you print media types actually put it in a magazine or something.
By SteveM

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Click here for original article

Feb.04 (China Military News cited from xinhua) — China on Tuesday expressed dissatisfaction over statements in a U.S. defense report on its military build-up, a Foreign Ministry spokesman said Tuesday.

“The QDR is playing the same old tune on China’s military construction,,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu told a regular press conference.

The U.S. military was drafting out a new air-sea battle plan in response to threats such as China’s military build-up and Iran’s possession of advanced weapons, said the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) of the U.S. Department of Defense issued on Feb. 1.

The report continued to make irresponsible remarks on China’s normal national defense construction and presumptuously claimed a lack of transparency in the Chinese military, which interfered in China’s internal affairs and misled public opinion, he said.

He reaffirmed that China unswervingly took the path of peaceful development and pursued a national defense policy that is defensive in nature.

China had taken a series of effective measures to boost the military transparency, and what China had done was there for all to see, he said.

He hoped that the United States would take a fair and objective view towards China’s development and its military construction, stop making irresponsible remarks and do more things conducive to the stable development of bilateral ties and mutual trust between the two countries as well as the two armed forces.

You may also be interested in

By admin

China, India boost defence as crisis takes toll on West from china-defense-mashup.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | No comments yet.

Click here for original article

Feb.03 (China Military News cited from Reuters and written by Adrian Croft) – China and India sharply raised defence spending in 2009 despite the economic crisis but most European NATO members face a squeeze on defence budgets as they rein in gaping deficits, a report said on Wednesday.

The impact of the global financial crisis on defence and security spending varied across regions and countries, the International Institute for Strategic Studies thinktank said in its annual report “The Military Balance”.

PLA Navy Warwhip’s Main Gun and HHQ-9 air Defense Missile

U.S. defence spending almost doubled under former President George W. Bush but President Barack Obama had signalled that the need to tackle a big budget deficit would require “a dramatic reprioritisation within defence spending”, it said.

Obama asked Congress this week to approve a record $708 billion in defense spending for fiscal 2011 — including a 3.4 percent increase in the Pentagon’s base budget — but said he would continue his drive to eliminate wasteful programmes.

A sharp recession had led the Russian government effectively to abandon a comprehensive military re-equipment plan due to run from 2007-15 and to replace it with a new 10-year plan starting in 2011, the report said.

“In contrast to developments in advanced economies, both India and China have maintained their recent trend of double-digit increases in defence spending,” it said.

PLA Army Type 59 Main Battle Tank 

India boosted defence spending by 21 percent in 2009 after the 2008 Mumbai attacks killed 166 people, it said.

China’s official 2009 budget included a 15 percent rise in defence spending to 480 billion yuan, equal to $70.3 billion at market exchange rates, the report said.

However, it said the official Chinese defence budget did not reflect the true level of resources devoted to the People’s Liberation Army. It was widely believed that the official budget took no account of weapons bought overseas or research and development funding, it said.
EUROPEAN DEFENCE LIKELY TO SUFFER

Other Asian countries, such as Australia, Indonesia and Singapore, had also posted increases in defence spending, it said.

PLA Air Force J-11B Fighter

In Europe, though, many countries had seen their budget deficits rise sharply as they pumped money into the economy to try to end the recession.

“When the time comes to redress these fiscal imbalances, discretionary spending will come under considerable pressure and defence is likely to suffer, particularly in those countries facing a looming demographic shift requiring greater expenditure on pensions and healthcare,” the editor of the Military Balance, James Hackett, wrote in the report.

Britain faced a challenge in reconciling its budget deficit with its large and growing future equipment plan, it said.

Among European members of NATO, only Norway and Denmark were likely to increase their defence budgets in 2010, and over the medium term most other countries would do well to increase defence spending in line with inflation or match existing budget levels, it said.

This would lead to pressure to step up pooling and multinational management of defence assets, to countries specialising in niche capabilities and to the collective procurement of critical defence equipment, it said.

You may also be interested in

By admin

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Chinese “20 ton” Helo Emerges from china-defense.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | No comments yet.

Click here for original article
In what appears to be yet another incredibly compressed development timeline, pictures emerged today of a prototype “20 ton” class helicopter with mounted towbar on a Chinese taxiway. A mere 15 months ago Russian arms maker Oboronprom and China’s AVICopter signed a memorandum to jointly develop a civilian heavy helicopter based on the Mi-46.At the time the agreement was signed, the Mi-46 was
By SteveM

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

The recent row over China/US relations from china-pla.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | No comments yet.

Click here for original article
As George Bush once said, the relationship between US and China is complicated. In many ways, I think China is one of the few policy areas that Bush got almost everything right. He started presidency with much anti-China rhetoric, but left the office as one of the most pro-China president in US history. It is my personal view that having a positive, engaging and pragmatic relationship with China is the most beneficial path that any US administration can take. Some people in the China-blue group (like Bill Gertz, John Bolton and Donald Rumsfeld) favoured antagonizing China through more support with Taiwan, labeling China as a threat/competitor and creating an encirclement of China through alliance with Australia, Japan and India. Bush started off in that corner, but he slowly moved to great engagement with China while maintaining strong relationships with regional allies like Australia and Japan. I think he basically did a really good of adapting to the rise of China, the increased role of China as America’s creditor and the interconnected economic relationship between the two countries. He started started the strategic dialog with China, which I think really helped the bilateral relationship. I think he was absolutely right in going to the Beijing Olympics when the pressure was on him not to. By the end of his presidency, he had built a really good working relationship with China and a good understanding of the country. He was able to work with China on critical political and economical issues, even though the two sides had vastly different views. I think China really appreciated that.

The Obama administration was definitely very China friendly in the first year. A major reason is America’s need for China to continue to buy US treasury bond in the midst of the economic meltdown in America. A lot of people got nervous or angry by the fact that Obama/Hilary put human rights on the back burners, but I think that is overplayed. I always think that it’s far more effective to encourage China and explain the importance of human rights privately rather than embarrassing the Politburo in public. I do think that Obama gave in too much to China in some of the early negotiations like his visit to China, because it emboldened China to ask for more and give in less to US in future negotiations. In many ways, this is the expected path. Washington insiders cannot expect America to negotiate from a position of absolute strength like during Clinton years, because China is just so much stronger now economically and politically. I don’t really want to put military in there, because China’s recent success comes from its status as the world’s leading creditor nation. As history as shown, power flows to where money is and that is playing out again in China today. Now that Washington has elevated China to be the other super power of the world in the past world, it would be hard to push back Chinese ambitions. We have a problem now where the Chinese leadership also has to satisfy and listen to the growing middle class that is more nationalistic and confident than ever. So, as Washington is pressing Obama to get more out of China, the Chinese population is also pressuring the Politburo to not give up any of its new found power. With this kind of power struggle between the two countries, it’s not surprising that we have run into the current row.

Now, to turn on our attention to the point of contentions of the recent weeks: Taiwan, Tibet, Google and Iran. If we start with Iran, we all know what the issue is here. China has a lot of money invested in the country and relies on Iran for future energy supply. You know we can say a lot about the type of regime in the country, but US is also dealing with a lot of unsavory characters in the Middle East. The question is whether or not it makes sense for China to support tougher sanctions in Iran. I actually think it does, but there is obviously a limit that China can go without risking all of its major contracts in Iran. The reason to support tougher sanctions on Iran are many. Even though Iran may not be as actively developing nuclear weapon or as further along in its development as the Israelis think, it does openly taunt the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. The danger to China is that more countries will seek for nuclear weapon and countries like Japan and South Korea will also develop it. I don’t think China is willing to accept that kind of strategical change. The more immediate threat comes from Israel. Now, the Israeli gov’t seemed to have given the Obama administration a deadline in harsh sanctions against Iran before it launches strikes against Iran’s nuclear targets. If that happens, Iran could cause all sort of problems in the Middle East if it manages to carry out its threat of shutting down oil/gas supplies in that region. Surging energy prices and instability in Middle Easts are definitely things that China would be afraid of. I’m really not sure how this will turn out. I can see that Israel will continue to ask for more from US and US will continue to ask for more support from China/Russia. At the end, I really don’t think US will get what it wants from China.

As for Google, I think this is more about China’s general cyber espionage effort against US governments and corporations rather than just Google. Let’s face it, these “attacks” against Google were attempts to get emails of human right activists rather than bringing down Google’s servers. It is not like we don’t know that China’s human rights record is rather poor. Rather than complaining to the Chinese gov’t and the media, the US government should run a similar cyber effort against China. And I think they are doing that, because China also claims to face a lot of cyber attacks. So in the end, I really don’t have a lot of sympathies for the US government or Google. Google is making a lot of noises about leaving China, but it is still operating in China with the self imposed censor turned on (despite its public claims otherwise). Like all other big corporations, it’s number 1 goal is to make more money. If it thinks that the cost of business outweighs the benefits, then it will leave the country. Clearly, the other 30 target firms are not going anywhere. The US government is in a position to fight fire with fire. If US wants to remain the IT leader of the world, then it should be able to create security and infiltrate other networks better than any other countries in the world. I think this issue will die down as soon as Google finds a solution with the Chinese gov’t. I really don’t think it will leave the country, because it does not want to totally abandon the search engine and especially the cell phone market for the future.

As a result of not receiving Chinese support on some issues, I think the recent moves are calculated actions by the Obama administration saying that we are not going to play “nice guy” with you anymore. Taiwan and Tibet are certainly the two things that agitate China more than anything else. To much of the Western world, Taiwan is just an Asian nation with a democratic gov’t threatened by China and Tibet is a land occupied by the brutal repression of China. Of course, the sympathetic image of Tibet is played up by the non-threatening zen-like image of Dalai Lama. The image of Dalai Lama as this international loved religious leader has basically elevated Tibet freedom ahead of many other larger and more repressed groups. One would really have to study Chinese history to see why the Chinese gov’t and its people have such a dislike to Taiwan Independence and Dalai Lama.

To the Chinese people, the 100 years from 1840 to 1949 was its century of humiliation where it had to give up part of its sovereignty and surrender its land to foreigners. It is important to take back all that it was forced to give up during that period. When China was negotiating with UK for the return of Hong Kong, Deng Xiaoping actually told Margaret Thatcher that “China is not Argentina” and that China would take Hong Kong back by force if necessary. So to Chinese people, Taiwan is a reminder that China was forced to give up land to foreign occupiers during that century. To Chinese people, Tibet was a backward, feudal region that was briefly taken away early this century and was liberated of those oppressive Lamas and foreigners in 1950s. Of course, there are strategic element to it. The navy does not think that it can truly operate beyond the first chain until the hostile ROCN is no longer at its door step. The army believes that it needs Tibet as a buffer zone and natural barrier that protects the nation from the Indians. There are obviously more to it. Most Chinese people believe that Han people everywhere are really Chinese and should rejoin China. They find the Dalai Lama request for true autonomy (This Forbes Article contains the key facts) to be more appalling for the following reasons:

  • The land requested by Dalai Lama is not just the current Tibet autonomous region, but also includes large parts of surrounding provinces.
  • These lands are requested despite the fact that Han population have long been the majority in some of those areas.
  • The so called autonomy actually sounds more like sovereignty, because Chinese troops is no longer allowed on the land. There is no way that PLA can accept this due to the strategic implications against India.
  • Dalai Lama requested China to stop transferring Han population to Tibet, but that has never actually happened. How can the 3 million Tibetans remain in majority if PRC actually tried to relocate Han people there?
  • Dalai Lama, the former feudal ruler of Tibet with many slaves, is insincere when it comes to democracy for Tibetans.

Therefore, the divergence of opinion on the military sale to Taiwan stems from how the West and China sees Taiwan. Most Westerners believe that Taiwan is a separate sovereign entity that should only rejoin China if it wishes to do so. Therefore, Americans see these military sales as fulfilling the Taiwan Relation Act by providing Taiwan with additional defensive deterrent. The weapons themselves are very advanced, but they are defensive in nature and are not going to change the military balance across the straits. The best hope for Taiwan is still to make peace with China and maintaining strong relationship with America. So, what is the problem? Well, most Chinese people believe that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China that no other country should interfere with. Therefore, any sales to Taiwan is looked as containing Chinese power, violating its sovereignty and interfering with its internal affairs. While this might have been acceptable in the past, the increasingly confident Chinese public are no longer willing to keep quiet to such snobs. The meeting with Dalai Lama stokes anger in China for similar reasons. The Politburo has to make a lot of noise and take what appears to be strong actions to satisfy the public. In the past, we have often heard cases where the government publicly criticizes another head of state meeting Dalai Lama, but then telling them privately that things will be business as usual. I tend to think that will happen again here. They will make a lot of noise and suspend military contacts, but those things will be re-established sometimes next year. I don’t think the Obama administration needs to meet Dalai Lama again or sell weapons to Taiwan again for a few years, so things should smooth out by later this year. At the end of the day, it is in China’s interest to have strong working relationship and military exchanges with America. The PRC leadership is too pragmatic to let this drag on. On the other hand, I think the sanctions against US companies could happen. Since US has been sanctioning Chinese companies for years for doing business with Iran, I think punishing American companies for helping Taiwan is pretty logical. They really don’t do much business with Lockheed and Raytheon, so any kind of sanctions against them would be quite symbolic. They do a lot of business with Boeing, but Boeing is selling very minimal to Taiwan. The trickiest case here is Sikorsky and its parent company UTC. They do a ton of business with UTC. In fact, PLA even operates some blackhawk helicopters, some unmanned version of S-300C and PWC engines on some helicopters/air planes. Can they really sanction a company that they sort of depends on for some secondary defense project? Especially now that Eurocopter announced recently that they are also selling to Taiwan. Can China sanction Eurocopter when it is partners with Eurocopter on so many projects? We will see. I tend to think that any sanctions against US/EU companies over weapons sale to Taiwan at the moment would not be more symbolic than anything else. Maybe they will warn these companies that any future sales would be met with harsher sanctions.

In general, I think we have entered a phase where the Politburo has to be more vocal against US government and companies for support toward Taiwan and Tibet, because the public and the military demand it. Politburo can no longer accept explanations like “the previous administration did it” or “these weapons are only defensive” or “we have to do it for political reasons” and remain quiet, because it has to satisfy the local population and the military too. At the moment, the retaliatory actions will remain mostly air like in previous occasions, but they will be a lot stronger in the future if US decides to sell an offensive platform like F-16 to Taiwan. Basically, the balance of power between the two nations is shifting and the Chinese responses against perceived US snubs are only going to get stronger.

By Feng

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

PLA improves strategic projection capability from china-defense.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | No comments yet.

Click here for original article
This is not a news item per se, but it does confirm a well-known fact that the extensive Chinese rail network buildup has a military dimension. While this PLA daily article acknowledges the prolonged military rail extension in Yunnan, it forgets to mention a similar extension in Fujian as result of the 1996 “large-scale-military-exercise.” Although the railroad extension will not speed up
By Coatepeque

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

No, it is not another DF-15 variant. from china-defense.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | No comments yet.

Click here for original article
Just a decoy, part of the PLA’s anti-PGM defense.
By Coatepeque

Click here for original article
Together with the Z-9 Search-and-Rescue conversion project, the addition of four new Z-8HK will significantly boost Hong Kong Garrison’s Search-and-Rescue capability. It is time for the CMC to put this show-case unit to good use by start saving lives.2009年昌飞公司科研生产双丰收本报讯 2009年是昌飞公司不平凡的一年,这一年昌飞不仅迎来了建业40周年,而且在直升机科研生产发展上取得了令人瞩目的业绩。在 昌飞公司的服务保障下,公司生产交付的直8先后参加完成了海上阅兵和国庆60周年大阅兵。公司实现了4机成功首飞,
By Coatepeque

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

SINGAPORE 2010: Uncertainty over AVIC’s Z-15 from china-defense.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | No comments yet.

Click here for original article
DATE:02/02/10SOURCE:Flight InternationalSINGAPORE 2010: Uncertainty over AVIC’s Z-15http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/02/02/337911/singapore-2010-uncertainty-over-avics-z-15.htmlEurocopter’s EC-175 helicopter that it is developing and producing in China with AVIC had its first flight in December but progress on development of the Chinese version, Z-15, is unclear.”We started the EC-175 in
By Coatepeque

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

J-6 is Bad Feng Shui from china-defense.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | No comments yet.

Click here for original article
County parks fighter jet on local road triggering public criticismGlobal Times – County parks fighter jet on local road triggering public criticism * Source: Global Times * [03:25 February 04 2010]http://china.globaltimes.cn/society/2010-02/503519.htmlBy An BaijieA county government office in Hebei Province is under fire from the public for parking a decommissioned fighter jet on a high-traffic
By Coatepeque

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Britain, China pledge closer military ties from china-defense-mashup.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Click here for original article

Feb.03 (China Military Newsx cited from Xinhua) — A top British military official met on Wednesday with visiting Deputy Chief of General Staff of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Ma Xiaotian, pledging to strengthen bilateral military ties.

Jock Stirrup, Chief of the Defence Staff, said during the meeting that the British military “attaches great importance to the friendly relationship” with the Chinese military and expects more efforts to be made to improve mutual understanding and trust and to step up pragmatic cooperation.

Jock Stirrup, Chief of the Defence Staff

Ma suggested that both sides should maintain high level exchange visits, steadily promote the communication and cooperation of professional personnel, expand cooperation and push forward the relationship between the two militaries.

Ma also met with Simon McDonald, British prime minister’s adviser on foreign policy and co-chaired a defence consultation.

You may also be interested in

By admin

Chinese medical team sets up clinic in shelter for Haitian quake victims from china-defense-mashup.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Click here for original article

Feb.01 (China Military News cited from Xinhua) — A Chinese medical team has relocated its operation site to a shelter in the Haitian capital where it will provide services more directly and conveniently to earthquake victims, the team’s leader said on Monday.

The Mais Gate shelter is located near the Port-Au-Prince interantional airport and can accommodate as many as 5,000 people, Wang Yurong, head of the team, told Xinhua.

Inside the shelter, both living and working conditions are crude, he said. There are tents provided by international donors and improvised cotes made by locals with tree branches and plastic sheets.

The aim of relocating the team’s operational site from a downtown plaza to the shelter is to provide more direct and convenient services to the earthquake victims, said Wang.

On Monday, the team treated 536 victims and 60 percent of them were women and children.

Since its arrival in the quake-ravageed Caribbean nation on Jan. 25, the team has provided services to more than 1,800 Haitians, and trauma, diarrhea and gynecological diseases were the most common conditions it had treated, according to Wang.

Yang Zhengzhou, an epidemic specialist in the team, told Xinhua that the Mais Gate shelter is pretty much crowded, with garbage littering everywhere and waste water flowing around.

There are many mosquitoes and flies, but they can hardly resist the pesticides and will die instantly after pesticides are used, he said.

Chinese doctors decided to teach the locals with epidemic prevention methods rather than simply giving them the equipment and medicine, said Yang.

The Chinese team gathered 10 volunteers in the shelter and taught them how to prepare the medicines and how to use the sprayers.

Under the team’s instructions, the volunteers conducted a thorough sterilization of the shelter. Thus, even after the Chinese team leaves, locals can do the epidemic prevention work by themselves.

The Chinese team consists of 40 medical workers, among whom are internists, surgeons and anti-epidemic experts from China’s military medical service.

They have participated in other UN peacekeeping missions and the massive rescue mission after a devastating quake hit southwest China’s Sichuan province in 2008.

You may also be interested in

By admin

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

China plans to export Advanced UAV, carrying with air-surface missiles from china-defense-mashup.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Click here for original article

Feb.01 (China Military Power Reporting by Johanthan Weng) — Recently, Xi’an Modern Control Technology Institute was successfully passed a design review of missile and parts used by an unmanned reconnaissance and attack aircraft, by the Project Management Department of AVIC. This event tells a truth that the Xi’an Modern Control Technology Institute have made a major breakthrough in the field of Attacking UAV development.

The institute self-financed and carried out three projects development. Especially, the distinguished performance of UAV in counter-terrorism, targeted killings, maintaining border stability has been dig out. At present, the reconnaissance-attack UAV made by this institute has successfully air-launched missile and hit the target for the first time in China. The unmanned surveillance attack aircraft for PLA will be formally engineering projected. The variant type of similar UAV has been signed exportation agreement for expanding overseas market.

You may also be interested in

By admin

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

China, Iran Prompt U.S. Air-Sea Battle Plan in Strategy Review from china-defense-mashup.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Click here for original article

Feb.01 (China Military Newx cited from Bloomberg and written by Viola Gienger and Tony Capaccio) — The U.S. military is drawing up a new air-sea battle plan in response to threats such as China’s persistent military build-up and Iran’s possession of advanced weapons, according to the Pentagon’s latest strategy review.

The Air Force and Navy are seeking more effective ways of ensuring continued access to the western Pacific and countering potential threats to American bases and personnel, according to the Quadrennial Defense Review to be released later today.

The joint Air Force-Navy plan would combine the strengths of each service to conduct long-range strikes that could utilize a new generation of bombers, a new cruise missile and drones launched from aircraft carriers. The Navy also is increasing funding to develop an unmanned underwater vehicle, according to the report.

Z-9 Helicopter and anti-submarine torpedo

The battle plan is among a range of new initiatives outlined in the review, which is conducted every four years to revise U.S. military strategy for the coming decade or more. The new report places top priority on the fights in Afghanistan and Iraq and against terrorist threats elsewhere, while also preparing for future threats.

“This is truly a wartime QDR,” Defense Secretary Robert Gates wrote in a cover letter for the report. “For the first time, it places the current conflicts at the top of our budgeting, policy and program priorities.”

Two-War Capability

The review deemphasizes but does not abandon the Pentagon’s doctrine that calls for the military to be able to fight two major wars nearly simultaneously. It acknowledges this mission but says planning should focus more closely on other scenarios, such as irregular warfare including conflicts involving insurgents or drug traffickers and even humanitarian disasters.

“In the mid- to long-term, U.S. military forces must plan and prepare to prevail in a broad range of operations that may occur in multiple theaters in overlapping time frames,” the Defense Department says in the review.

Air-defense missile of PLA Navy Type 052B Destroyer

“This includes maintaining the ability to prevail against two capable nation-state aggressors,” it states.

Alluding to China in his cover letter, Gates cites longer- term threats such as “the military modernization programs of other countries.” He also hints at dangers such as al-Qaeda in referring to “non-state groups developing more cunning and destructive means to attack the United States and our allies and partners.”

Tensions With China

U.S. officials have often called on their Chinese counterparts to provide explanations and assurances that their moves are purely defensive. The two countries resumed military talks last June, then China halted visits again over the Defense Department’s Jan. 29 announcement of a new arms sale to Taiwan.

China is developing and deploying “large numbers” of advanced missiles, new attack submarines, long-range air defense systems and capabilities to wage electronic warfare and target computer systems, according to the report, which echoes an assessment of China’s military power issued almost a year ago.

China’s refusal to provide adequate assurances of its intentions raises “a number of legitimate questions regarding its long-term intentions,” the Pentagon says in the review.

Citing “more complex” security conditions in the region, including North Korea and terrorist threats in Southeast Asia, the review calls for “a more widely distributed” and flexible U.S. presence in Asia that relies more on allies. Partners would include Australia, Thailand, the Philippines, Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam.

Threat From Iran

In the Middle East, Iran is fielding small attack boats in the Persian Gulf, a development that U.S. officials have cited in the past. That compounds the threat to naval operations from the acquisition by Iran and other nations of weapons such as quiet submarines and advanced cruise missiles that can target ships, according to the report.

Iran also has provided drones and shoulder-fired missiles to the Islamic militant group Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Russia and other nations have contributed to the spread of surface-to- air missiles, the department said.

Among the solutions proposed are more ways to deploy U.S. forces abroad, such as naval assets, “in regions facing new challenges.” Existing bases also need to be either hardened to protect against potential attacks or reinforced with back-up locations or by dispersing them in multiple places, the department concluded.

The Pentagon has about 400,000 U.S. military personnel stationed overseas, either in war zones or elsewhere. The review emphasizes “taking care of our people” serving in multiple long deployments that take a “significant toll” on them and their families.

Other Concerns

In addition to supporting existing wars, the Quadrennial review emphasizes the need for more unmanned aircraft, intelligence, special forces, helicopters and long-range strike capabilities as well as skills such as foreign languages and training of foreign military forces.

PLA Army Type 05 SPH

The U.S. military, especially the Navy and Air Force, also should find better and faster ways to strengthen the defense systems of foreign allies and partners as needed, the Pentagon said.

The Pentagon should continue to maintain a nuclear arsenal as a “core mission” until “such time as the administration’s goal of a world free of nuclear weapons is achieved,” according to the report.

The potential threat of cyber attacks and the need to conduct “high-tempo operations” will require more expertise in that field and centralized command of cyber operations, the department said.

You may also be interested in

By admin

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

China suspends military visits with U.S. over planned arms sales to Taiwan from china-defense-mashup.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Click here for original article

BEIJING, Jan. 30 (Xinhua) — China on Saturday decided to suspend scheduled visits between the Chinese and U.S. armed forces, in response to Washington’s plan to sell a package of arms worth about 6.4 billion U.S. dollars to Taiwan.

“We made the decision out of considerations on the severe harm of the U.S. arms sales to Taiwan,” said Defense Ministry spokesman Huang Xueping in a statement.

The U.S. government on Friday announced the plans to sell a package of arms to Taiwan, which include Patriot missiles, Black Hawk helicopters and minesweepers. China immediately expressed strong indignation about the sale after the U.S. government notified the U.S. Congress of the plans.

Qian Lihua, director of the Defense Ministry’s Foreign Affairs Office, on Saturday summoned the defense attache of the U.S. Embassy in Beijing to lodge a stern protest.

“The Chinese military expresses grave indignation and strongly condemns such a move to grossly interfere into China’s internal affairs and harm China’s national security interests,” Qian said in a press release of the office.

Taiwan issue is related to China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and concerns China’s core interests.

“The U.S. arms sales to Taiwan gravely violates the three joint communiques between China and the United States, and seriously endangers China’s national security and harms China’s reunification course,” Qian said.The U.S. such move also constitutes severe violation of the agreements reached by the top leaders of both sides on the China-U.S. relations in the new situation, he said.

Bayi-Building, the location of Chinese Defense Ministry

It runs counter to the principles of the joint statement issued during U.S. President Barack Obama’s visit to China in November last year, said Qian.

The U.S. plan will definitely bring about serious negative impact on the relations between the two countries and militaries, and will to the end severely undermine the interests of the United States itself, he noted.

The United States have reiterated in many occasions that it will adhere to the one-China policy, abide by the three joint communiques and support the peaceful development of relations across the Taiwan Straits.

“However, the United States now takes faithless action to sell arms to Taiwan again,” Qian said such plans severely poison the political foundation of the relations between the two militaries, and produce grave obstacles to military exchanges between the two sides.

Qian urged the United States to respect China’s core interests and concerns, take practical actions to abide by its solemn commitments on Taiwan issue, withdraw its arms sales items to Taiwan, and stop military links with Taiwan, in order not to create further damage to the relations between the two countries and the two militaries and to the peace and stability across the Taiwan Straits.

“We reserve the right of taking further actions,” he noted.

According to Huang, the spokesman, “such a move is gravely against especially the ‘Aug. 17′ communique signed in 1982.”

The U.S. side states in the Communique that “it does not seek to carry out a long-term policy of arms sales to Taiwan” and “intends to reduce gradually its sales of arms to Taiwan, leading over a period of time to a final resolution.”

“We will never give in or compromise in this issue,” the statement quoted Huang as saying, noting that the Chinese military will firmly fight against any move to destroy China’s national sovereignty security and territorial integrity.

You may also be interested in

By admin

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

CATIC/AVIC at this year’s Singapre Air Show. from china-defense.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Click here for original article
Despite the recent media hooray, the-40-million-dollar-J-10 is a no-show this year. (here) (here) (here)Can’t wait for a J-10 for 40? how about a six-dollar-burger to tie you over.Where are the booth-bunnies? Really, there’s nothing special on display at the CATIC/AVIC booth.
By Coatepeque

Tags: , , , ,

Target practice, PLA style. from china-defense.blogspot.com

digg del.icio.us TRACK TOP
By chinasecurityblog | Filed in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Click here for original article
If you look like him, don’t plan to visit China.
By Coatepeque

Tags: , , ,


\